题目:Winners Keep Winning? The Asymmetric Impacts of High-speed Rail (HSR) Connection on Urban Specialization
时间:2025年5月13日 15:30-17:00
地点:suncitygroup太阳新城官网 F210会议室
邀请人:周耀明 副教授(工业工程与管理系)
Biography
Anming Zhang is a Professor in Operations and Logistics and holds Vancouver International Airport Authority Chair Professor in Air Transportation at Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia. He is the President of the World Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) and was, in 2020, the President of Transportation and Public Utilities Group (TPUG) of American Economic Association. He is the recipient of the“Yokohama Special Prize for Outstanding Young Researcher” awarded at the 7th World Conference on Transportation Research (WCTR) in Sydney, Australia in 1995, and of the Best Paper Prize at the International Transport Economics Association (ITEA) Conference on Transportation Economics, Toulouse, France in 2014. Currently, He is in the Executive Committees of WCTR, the Co Editor-in-Chief of Transport Economics and Management and the Co Editor-in-Chief of Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
Abstract
Changes in intercity transport costs can reshape patterns of urban specialization and contribute to regional inequality. This paper explores the effects of high-speed rail (HSR) on regional disparity by examining the asymmetric impacts of HSR connections on urban specialization between core and peripheral cities. Leveraging a set of city-pair-level indicators capturing HSR connection and a difference-in-differences (DID) strategy with high-dimensional fixed effects, we find that HSR connections significantly intensity intercity specialization. Sectoral analysis reveals that HSR connections widen the employment gaps in the service sector between core and peripheral cities, while narrowing the gap in manufacturing employment. This suggests a siphoning effect in the service sector, where large cities increasingly attract employment from smaller neighbors. The effect is particularly pronounced among city pairs characterized by greater development gaps, geographic proximity, and divergent industrial structures. Additional evidence indicates that the service sector response is primarily driven by growth effects, whereas the manufacturing response reflects a redistribution of existing employment.